Exploring the impact and implications of the controversial decision to ban certain words within the CDC.
Language shapes our reality. When certain words are banned or discouraged, it not only limits the language we use but also the concepts we can discuss. In December 2017, reports emerged that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were advised to avoid using seven specific words in budget documents. This directive sparked a significant debate about the role of language in policy-making and public health.
The significance of this issue extends far beyond semantics. Words matter - they influence thought, behaviour, and policy decisions. When terms like 'evidence-based' and 'science-based' are discouraged, it sends a troubling message about the value of scientific research in informing policy. This is particularly concerning in an era where misinformation can spread rapidly, and public trust in institutions is paramount.
The seven words that were initially banned are: Vulnerable, Entitlement, Diversity, Transgender, Fetus, Evidence-based, and Science-based. Each of these words carries significant weight and represents critical concepts in public health and social policy.
For instance, 'vulnerable' highlights groups at higher risk of health issues, while 'entitlement' often pertains to social safety nets essential for many. 'Diversity' is pivotal in ensuring representation and equity, and 'transgender' is crucial for acknowledging and addressing the needs of the transgender community. The terms 'fetus,' 'evidence-based,' and 'science-based' are fundamental in medical and scientific discourse. Removing these words can hinder the ability to communicate effectively about essential health and social issues.
The impact of banning specific words can be far-reaching. In my career, I have seen how language influences workplace culture and policy implementation. For example, in one organisation, the reluctance to use terms like 'diversity' and 'inclusion' led to a lack of focus on creating a truly inclusive environment. This resulted in lower employee engagement and higher turnover rates.
On the flip side, when we embrace inclusive language, we create a culture that values all voices. At ThinkEDI, we have seen the power of language in action. By using precise and inclusive terms, we help organisations develop DEI strategies that lead to measurable improvements in employee satisfaction and productivity. Language is a powerful tool for change, and it is crucial that we use it wisely.
Language plays a critical role in either promoting inclusion or perpetuating exclusion. Words can either open doors to understanding and empathy or shut them firmly. For instance, failing to acknowledge 'transgender' individuals in policy documents can lead to their needs being overlooked, resulting in policies that do not address their specific challenges.
In my experience, effective communication that includes all relevant terms is essential for creating inclusive policies and practices. At ThinkEDI, we advocate for the use of language that reflects the diversity of our communities. This approach ensures that everyone feels seen and valued, which is fundamental to building equitable and inclusive environments.
Advocating for inclusive language is a proactive step towards creating a more equitable society. First, we must educate ourselves and others about the importance of language in shaping policies and perceptions. This involves challenging directives that seek to limit our vocabulary and advocating for the use of terms that reflect the realities of diverse communities.
One practical step is to review and revise organisational documents to ensure they use inclusive language. At ThinkEDI, we have developed tools to help organisations audit their language use and make necessary adjustments. By fostering a culture of continuous learning and improvement, we can ensure that our language reflects our commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.